Skip to main content

Table 3 Final recommendations in order of importance (median score) and level of agreement (mean absolute deviation)

From: Multi-sector stakeholder consensus on tackling the complex health and social needs of the growing population of people leaving prison in older age

Rank

Item

Importance (Median)

Level of agreement (Mean Absolute Deviation)

1

Immediate health needs on release should be taken care of (Uninterrupted access to mobility equipment, sufficient prescription medication to outlast any service delays or public holidays)

9

0.39

2

Introduce health assessments in prison that are aligned with Commonwealth funded aged care services, that also include a risk assessment component

9

0.44

3

Cognitive function and dementia assessment/diagnosis should be available to all older people in prison

9

0.61

4

Clearer responsibilities and roles on the part of community services (e.g., disability, aged care) to remove the risk of this group falling between the gaps

9

0.66

5

Improved systems for information sharing, administration and communication between stakeholders and services

9

0.72

6

Longer and consistent funding to allow programs to be piloted, evaluated and implemented

9

0.76

6

Sustainable funding models for programs that are found to be effective

9

0.76

8

Establishment of an independent reintegration team to liaise with all the different groups and services involved in release planning

9

0.79

9

Transition planning should occur as early as possible during a person’s time in custody (ideally at least 3–6 months prior to release)

9

0.83

9

Fill service gaps for First Nations prison leavers who have unique cultural and health needs

9

0.83

11

Increased housing options specifically for older people who are leaving prison, especially those convicted of sex crimes

9

0.85

12

Seamless transition between state or commonwealth services and in-prison services for people entering and leaving prison (ie going from a Medicare to Justice Health environment, and leaving again)

9

1.05

13

Fill service gaps for women leaving prison in older age

9

1.07

14

Existing transition programs should review their criteria to allow increased eligibility of older people who may not be ‘high risk’

9

1.12

14

Increased cooperation from Local Health Districts for release planninga

9

1.12

16

Parole boards should reconsider programs that are not suited for older people due to issues such as cognitive ability

9

1.27

17

Preventative functional maintenance programs are needed to prevent deterioration during incarceration

8

0.80

18

Intense, person-centered case management approach developed with the input of the individual

8

0.97

19

Government funded, centralised transition support and advocacy roles that bridge pockets of practice across areas

8

1

20

Increased use of diversion policies for older people who could be better housed/rehabilitated elsewhere

8

1.02

21

Activities in the community to help make new social connections

8

1.05

22

Increased independence and responsibility during incarcerated life to emulate more real-world conditions (e.g., responsibility for meals)

8

1.15

23

Life skills courses to prepare for release that is focused on daily living (e.g., cooking, transport) and accessing services (e.g., going to the bank)

8

1.17

24

Prison leavers should have a physical transition support “package” in hand (including e.g., key contacts for local services, tips, to do lists, medical records and identification)

8

1.17

25

Programs to increase self-efficacy and agency in older people leaving prison

8

1.20

26

Digital literacy/ technology readiness programs (e.g., smartphones, internet, accessing services online) for older people

8

1.22

26

Increased education for nursing homes and aged care staff to reduce stigma and increase confidence

8

1.22

28

A review of medical parole policies and their apparent underutilisation

8

1.27

29

Older people leaving prison should be deemed a priority population for the Commonwealth funded Care Finders initiative to help access aged care services (includes a workforce of First Nations facilitators)b

8

1.37

30

Release planning should occur regardless of risk level

8

1.41

31

Release ‘practice’ via excursions, or immersive experiences (e.g., videos, role play, virtual reality) to increase familiarity with post-release life

8

1.44

32

A trauma-informed care framework should be adopted by all stakeholders

8

1.46

33

Initiatives to increase public awareness of the existence of this population and the societal economic and human rights implications

8

1.66

34

Initiatives to address stigma in the general public towards prison leavers, especially against those convicted of sex crimes

8

1.95

35

A state/national forum for stakeholders to share experiences and plan to work together better

7

1.47

36

Peer mentoring by someone with lived experience, involving both counselling and moral support

7

1.66

37

Increased involvement from religious groups in the community to meet spiritual and social needs

6

1.95

  1. aLocal Health Districts exist only in New South Wales. The state is divided into 15 Local Health Districts with the objective of making decisions and delivering healthcare at a local level
  2. bThe Care Finders is a free, Commonwealth (national) government-funded service to assist vulnerable older peoplefind aged care and other relevant support