Skip to main content

Table 3 Summary of included articles

From: Exploring barriers to and enablers of adequate healthcare for Indigenous Australian prisoners with cancer: a scoping review drawing on evidence from Australia, Canada and the United States

Study

Study design

Location

Health focus

Issues identified

Courtwright et al. (2008)

Case report

United States

Lung cancer

• Security identified as a barrier to providing equitable healthcare

• Healthcare team unable to notify family of patient status

• Prisoner unable to engage in activities usually allowed to enhance comfort (television, going outside to smoke, speaking to hospital chaplain)

• Cultural conflict between prison & health care system

Lin and Mathew (2005)

Quantitative survey study

United States

Cancer; pain management

• Inadequate pain management

• The majority of prisoners with cancer may be under-medicated

• Training in cancer pain management as poor or fair by 74 % of Primary Care Practitioners (PCPs)

• Common barriers identified by PCPs include concerns about drug misuse/diversion & concerns about patient credibility

Lum (2003)

Commentary

New Zealand

Palliative care (cancer identified as most common diagnosis)

• Treatment often isolating; prisoners may choose to forego

• Restricted availability of medical professionals

• Prison regulations take precedence over care services (e.g. visitors)

• Excessive caution regarding the prescription of medication

Markman (2007)

Commentary

United States

Cancer

• High prevalence of drug abuse made pain management an issue

• Unscheduled interruptions in treatment due to sudden transfer or release

Mathew et al. (2005)

Case control study

United States

Cancer

• Pain management problematic due to high prevalence of drug misuse

• Terminal illness didn’t guarantee parole

O’Connor (2004)

Case report

United States

Lung cancer; mental health

• Late diagnosis due to prisoner’s complaints not being heard

• Prison staff acted in the absence of informed consent from patient

• Acting as both representative of the prison and the prisoner presented a dilemma for the service provider

Pillet (2010)

Commentary

United States

Cancer

• Privacy vs. security (guard was always present)

• Limited communication between family and practitioners

• Family visitation limited

• Due to security, practitioners restricted in range of usual activities, including establishing rapport

Wujcik (2010)

Commentary

United States

Cancer

• Goal of oncology team may be in contrast to prison system

• Delays in diagnosis & staging compromised outcomes