|
Outcomes
|
Illustrative comparative risks* (95 % CI)
|
Relative effect (95 % CI)
|
No of Participants (studies)
|
Quality of the evidence (GRADE)
|
|---|
|
Assumed risk
|
Corresponding risk
|
|---|
|
Control
|
Interpersonal psychotherapy
|
|---|
Self report drug use dichotomous
Follow-up: mean 3 months
|
Study population
|
RR 0.67 (0.3 to 1.5)
|
38 (1 study)
| ⊕⊝⊝⊝ very low |
|
474 per 1000
|
317 per 1000 (142 to 711)
|
|
Moderate
|
- *The basis for the assumed risk (e.g. the median control group risk across studies) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95 % confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95 % CI)
-
CI confidence interval
- GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
-
High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect
-
Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate
-
Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate
-
Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate
