Skip to main content

Table 3 Baseline Age/Education-Adjusted Neurocognitive Data (N = 507)

From: Acceptability and effectiveness of a web-based psychosocial intervention among criminal justice involved adults

MicroCog Subtest Scaled Scores

Illegal Behavior/Criminal Justice Involvement

Significance Between Groupsa

CJS-none (n = 331)

CJS-Recommended (n = 69)

CJ Mandated (n = 176)

 

Mean (SD)

F-test, p value

Numbers Forward Total Score

8.41 (2.70)

8.94 (2.56)

8.94 (2.85)

F (2, 503) = 2.49, p = .08

Numbers Reversed Total Score

7.90 (2.51)

8.88 (3.08)

8.41 (2.87)

F (2, 503) = 4.60, p = .01b

Wordlist 1 Total Score

7.40 (4.59)

7.32 (4.58)

7.91 (4.18)

F (2, 502) = 0.54, p = .59

Wordlist 2 Total Score

9.62 (3.17)

9.59 (3.33)

9.73 (3.29)

F (2, 502) = 0.04, p = .96

Analogies Total Score

6.71 (2.90)

6.48 (2.57)

6.79 (2.92)

F (2, 503) = 0.28, p = .75

Object Match A Total Score

8.30 (3.86)

8.42 (4.31)

8.08 (3.82)

F (2, 499) = 0.19, p = .83

Object Match B Total Score

8.50 (3.16)

8.62 (3.37)

8.88 (2.95)

F (2, 498) = 0.60, p = .55

Clocks Total Score

11.00 (1.85)

10.77 (2.04)

11.16 (1.71)

F (2, 503) = 0.94, p = .39

  1. a adjusted for baseline abstinence
  2. b. Numbers reversed total scores is lower in CJS-none than CJS-recommended group. (t = 2.79, p < .01)