Skip to main content

Table 4 Mean of Collaboration Measures by CS and BH Collaboration Groups

From: Juvenile justice systems of care: results of a national survey of community supervision agencies and behavioral health providers on services provision and cross-system interactions

 

Collaboration groups based on low (0–0.36) and high (0.37+)

Total

CS Low/ BH Low

CS High/ BH Low

CS Low/ BH High

CS High/ BH High

F

p

f-index

eta-sq.

Unweighted n

185

33

40

28

84

    

Weighted n

3202

1229

666

536

771

  

Weighted %

100%

38%

21%

17%

24%

    

Weight Adjusted n

185

71

38

31

45

    

CS to BH Referral assertiveness (% of 14 items)

63%

53%

76%

60%

72%

19.08

0.000

0.57

0.25

CS Information received from BH (% of 8 items)

49%

53%

48%

23%

65%

7.71

0.000

0.36

0.12

CS Quality of direct BH services (% of 24 items)

11%

9%

13%

11%

14%

1.40

0.246

0.15

0.02

BH Information sent to CS (% of 8 items)

52%

45%

54%

52%

64%

2.33

0.076

0.20

0.04

BH Quality of direct BH services (% of 24 items)

60%

59%

58%

64%

63%

1.01

0.389

0.13

0.02

Average across above

47%

44%

50%

42%

55%

    
  1. The 4 groups explain 39% of the variance in the joint distribution of these measures of collaboration (1-Wilk’s lambda)
  2. Effect size f-index: small = 0.10, moderate = 0.25 and large = 0.40
  3. CS = community supervision; BH = behavioral health
  4. Bold indicates p < .001, f-index > 0.10, eta-sq > .01