Table 1 Associations between the Restrictiveness of Local Housing Authority ACO Policies (ACOP) Towards People with Criminal Justice Histories and County Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) and Sexually Transmitted Infection Rates per 100,000 County Population

ACOP Score

94

1.14***

0.40

104

11.20*

5.27

104

0.44

0.49

104

11.34

8.52

 Below Median ACOP Score

44

−6.05**

2.45

47

84.61**

− 39.20

47

−3.62

3.47

−61.05

57.41

 Above Median ACOP Score (Ref)

50

–

–

57

–

–

57

–

–

57

–

–

 1st (Range = 0, 1)

28

−8.55***

3.01

30

−47.22

32.34

30

−2.34

2.71

30

−58.03

63.21

 2nd (Range = 2, 5)

28

1.08

4.09

30

6.82

35.26

30

3.73

2.83

30

17.43

77.47

 3rd (Range = 6)

15

1.16

3.67

17

86.35**

40.27

17

4.09

3.97

17

98.69

66.78

 Ref: 4th (Range = 7, 8)

23

–

–

27

–

–

27

–

–

27

–

–

  Arrests and/or charges explicitly given less weight than conviction

52

−5.32**

2.35

55

8.91

25.6

55

1.91

2.25

55

25.91

55.74

  Ref: Arrests and/or charges not explicitly given less weight than conviction

42

–

–

49

–

–

49

–

–

49

–

–

  Mitigating circumstances explicitly considered

81

−2.02

2.86

88

−7.64

26.44

88

6.46^***

2.19

88

−5.11

48.17

  Ref: Mitigating circumstances not explicitly considered

13

–

–

16

–

–

16

–

–

16

–

–

  Circumstances related to nature of the violation explicitly considered as mitigating circumstance

47

−3.90^*

2.23

51

−57.65^*

32.49

51

−1.42

2.69

51

− 29.02

55.18

  Ref: Circumstances related to nature of the violation not explicitly considered as mitigating circumstance

47

–

–

53

–

–

53

–

–

53

–

–

  Impact on family explicitly considered as mitigating circumstance

39

−8.30^***

1.98

42

−98.66^***

30.20

42

−4.54

2.89

42

− 119.97^**

48.56

  Ref: Impact on family not explicitly considered as mitigating circumstance

55

–

–

62

–

–

62

–

–

62

–

–

  Family is explicitly permitted to remove member for any criminal/ drug use activity

46

−8.49^*

2.30

52

−93.95^**

39.94

52

−7.17^**

3.23

52

−109.78^*

56.00

  Ref: Family is not explicitly permitted to remove member for any criminal/ drug use activity

48

–

–

52

–

–

52

–

–

52

–

–

  Mitigating circumstances explicitly considered

56

−2.68

3.32

60

−46.45

33.78

60

−3.39

3.36

60

−61.61

55.37

  Ref: Mitigating circumstances not explicitly considered

38

–

–

44

–

–

44

–

–

44

–

–

  Proof of good tenancy explicitly considered as mitigating circumstance

29

−7.21^***

2.52

31

−40.722

33.18

31

−4.30

2.84

31

−17.99

53.01

  Ref: Proof of good tenancy not explicitly considered as mitigating circumstance

65

–

–

73

–

–

73

–

–

73

–

–

  Impact on family explicitly considered as mitigating circumstance

34

−0.20

3.93

36

−38.98

27.33

36

−2.62

2.45

36

−56.75

49.98

  Ref: Impact on family not explicitly considered as mitigating circumstance

60

–

–

68

–

–

68

–

–

68

–

–