Quality Appraisal Tool To be completed for each individual paper | |||
---|---|---|---|
Reference: |  ±  | Context (setting/sample): | |
Research Design | Are the research questions clear? | Â | Comment: |
Is there a clear statement of methodology? | Â | ||
Is sampling clearly described? | Â | ||
Is data collection clearly described? | Â | ||
Is there justification for methodology? | Â | ||
Are limitations acknowledged and discussed? | Â | ||
Findings | Are the findings credible? | Â | Comment: |
Are claims made supported by sufficient evidence? | Â | ||
Reporting | Is the method of data analysis clearly described? | Â | Comment: |
Are the data, interpretation, and conclusions well documented? | Â | ||
Is the paper clear, coherent, and well structured? | Â | ||
Does the study make a useful contribution to knowledge and understanding of experiences of food, meals and eating in the prison context? | Comment: | ||
Does the cultural context of the setting/sample affect the weighting given to the study? | Comment: | ||
Overall quality appraisal rating | LowModerateHigh |