Skip to main content

Table 3 Content analysis of barriers classified according to the five dimensions of Bronstein’s model of interprofessional collaboration

From: Physicians and nurses professional relationship with criminal investigation in dealing with survivors of sexual abuse: a scoping review

Themes

Interdependence

Newly created

professional activities

Flexibility

Collective ownership

of objectives

Reflection on the process

Collaboration

• Inequality in collaboration

• Isolated work.

• Different level of collaboration.

• Lack of interest in collaborating.

• Different work practices and philosophies.

• Lack of professional autonomy.

• Undervaluation and interference in the work of others.

• Divergent practices and points of view.

• Lack of common goals.

• Low satisfaction within the team.

• Conflicting objectives within the team.

• Not working full time.

• Different philosophies, goals, and values.

• Rare meetings about sexual assault cases.

Skills

  

• Function limits

• Role confusion

  

Communication

• Tension in communication.

• Omissive communication.

• Divergent opinions.

• Divergent concepts.

• “Silo Effect”.

• Misunderstanding of the functions.

• Lack of face-to-face meetings.

• No information outside the team.

Confidentiality

• Different confidentiality policies.

 

• Different obligations and rules regarding confidentiality.

  

Hierarchy

• Differences in status.

• Influence of older people on younger people.

• Hindered coordination by lack of understanding an interprofessional model.

• “turf wars”

• Power imbalances and difficulty in developing common goals.

 

Organizational

• Confusion of boundaries between organizations.

• Group rotation.

• Different organizational support.

• Lack of time and financing.

• Differences in valuation between organizations

 

• Blurred boundaries between systems.

• Lack of resources and time.

• Different goals in different organizations.

• Shift work.

• Time and space to meet with other professionals.

Relationship

• Groupthink

• Social conformity

• Tunnel vision

• Conflicts between disciplines

• Divergent working practices

• HP’s Perceptions of undervalued knowledge

• Lack of interaction between professionals

• Too much centralization

 

• Conflicts resulting from role negotiation.

• Lack of respect for the roles of others.

• Lack of trust among the team.

• Lack of interprofessional connection.